No Coaching Centres With Over 20 Students To Be Allowed In Residential Areas in Delhi

No Coaching Centres With Over 20 Students To Be Allowed: Dehli High Court on Thursday 15 February 2024 ordered that coaching centres with more than 20 students should move out of the residential area.

Get Dehli 2024 latest news and updates

According to a bench made up of Justice Manmeet PS Arora and Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, students who attend coaching centres located in residential buildings “run the risk of their lives”, because these buildings lack proper safety features like two stairs.

UPES Dehradun Application Forms Released. Apply Now!

There must be hundreds of students attending your classes. You should not be in a residential building. Move to a commercial building.”

“You cannot operate from a residential area. Where students are more than 20, you must move out,” Justice Manmeet P S Arora added.

Why Delhi High Court Restricts Coaching Centers with More Than 20 Students

When a fire broke out at a coaching centre in Mukherjee Nagar last year in June, the High Court filed a case by taking suo motu cognizance of the incident. Students were seen using ropes to climb down the building.

According to initial investigations, the five-story building’s electrical meter board might have been the source of the fire. According to investigators, there were approximately 250 students taking classes at Bhandari House at the time.

In February 2020, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) modified its Unified Building Bye Laws-2016 (UBBL-2016), including coaching centres in the definition of “Educational Buildings”.

The petitioner appealed the court’s decision to include coaching centres in the definition of “educational buildings,” mandating them to implement specified fire safety measures, among other things.

“The DDA has come up with a notification classifying me as an educational institute. The notification came out in 2020. We are seeking that the notification must go and we need clarification,” advocate Rajeshwari Hariharan, appearing in the court on behalf of the petitioner, said.

The court stated that it cannot stay a notification that was released in 2020, but it did order that the petition be scheduled for a hearing before another division bench on Friday, which addresses the matter of fire safety at coaching centres.

“We cannot stay a 2020 notification. This is involving human lives,” the court said.

The comment section is below if you have any doubts related to this you can share it freely and our team will respond to you as soon as possible.

FAQs

Q: Why did the Delhi High Court restrict coaching centres with more than 20 students?

A: The Delhi High Court restricted coaching centres with more than 20 students because it came out that such centres in residential areas posed a risk to students’ lives due to inadequate safety features.

Q: What was the response to the petitioner’s appeal regarding the DDA’s notification?:

A: The court couldn’t reverse the 2020 notification by the DDA but scheduled a hearing to address fire safety concerns at coaching centres, emphasizing the importance of protecting human lives.

Q: How did the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) contribute to the issue?

A: The DDA included coaching centres in the definition of “Educational Buildings” under the Unified Building Bye Laws-2016 (UBBL-2016), subjecting them to specific fire safety requirements. This was in response to concerns about safety standards.

Q: What made the court take action against coaching centres?

A: There was a big fire at a coaching centre where many students were in danger. This made the court realize that coaching centres in residential areas might not have proper safety measures